Battle of the Crowns -- calibration data [are we there yet?]

Archive of the old Parsimony forum. Some messages couldn't be restored. Limitations: Search for authors does not work, Parsimony specific formats do not work, threaded view does not work properly. Posting is disabled.

Battle of the Crowns -- calibration data [are we there yet?]

Postby He just won't go away: D » 27 Jun 2000, 19:52

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: He just won't go away: Dann Corbit at 27 June 2000 20:52:39:


Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
------------- ------ --- --- ---- ------ ---- ------
Crafty : 2516 16 22 1073 67.3 % 2391 25.4 %
SOS : 2441 25 29 533 60.3 % 2368 21.6 %
Comet : 2431 17 17 1257 56.6 % 2385 23.9 %
LGoliath : 2430 23 19 822 53.4 % 2406 26.5 %
AnMon : 2411 24 20 803 52.4 % 2394 23.4 %
Patzer : 2397 23 29 564 49.7 % 2398 23.6 %
Phalanx : 2396 19 22 943 49.0 % 2403 19.9 %
Gromit3 : 2381 41 34 285 50.7 % 2377 21.4 %
TCBishop : 2378 21 24 768 47.9 % 2392 21.6 %
Amy : 2359 25 36 486 64.6 % 2254 13.6 %
Gromit2 : 2358 25 27 545 44.1 % 2399 24.4 %
Francesca : 2340 24 27 572 45.2 % 2374 25.3 %
ZChess : 2331 21 25 701 47.6 % 2348 23.1 %
Yace : 2327 35 30 367 52.7 % 2308 23.7 %
Bringer : 2311 26 30 499 48.5 % 2321 21.2 %
Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
------------- ------ --- --- ---- ------ ---- ------
ArasanX : 2287 37 31 344 51.5 % 2277 20.3 %
LambChop : 2279 41 34 291 38.3 % 2362 19.6 %
Ant : 2256 31 30 436 54.5 % 2225 18.6 %
GnuChess4 : 2256 65 67 99 46.5 % 2280 14.1 %
InmiChess3 : 2245 50 45 187 51.9 % 2232 16.0 %
ExChess3 : 2226 26 32 507 60.4 % 2153 14.2 %
Knightx : 2216 49 57 146 48.6 % 2225 19.2 %
InmiChess2 : 2199 96 76 59 34.7 % 2308 18.6 %
Dragon : 2166 59 36 212 30.0 % 2314 15.6 %
GnuChess5 : 2155 50 66 130 64.2 % 2053 16.2 %
Fortress : 2144 67 68 92 56.0 % 2103 16.3 %
LDBlanche : 2131 57 42 170 34.1 % 2246 20.0 %
Amyan : 2115 57 58 135 47.8 % 2131 9.6 %
Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
------------- ------ --- --- ---- ------ ---- ------
Gully2 : 2062 59 64 119 49.6 % 2065 10.1 %
Cilian : 2051 46 40 213 39.0 % 2129 20.7 %
ColChess : 2044 65 69 92 58.2 % 1986 18.5 %
SSEChess : 2010 81 49 114 29.4 % 2163 14.9 %
Sjeng : 2002 48 42 205 40.2 % 2071 17.1 %
Averno : 1992 61 34 239 31.0 % 2131 7.5 %
Freyr : 1946 63 97 83 64.5 % 1843 3.6 %
Crux : 1938 101 96 46 42.4 % 1991 15.2 %
DChess : 1920 77 57 109 39.0 % 1998 6.4 %
NewRival : 1911 87 68 73 35.6 % 2014 16.4 %
Faile : 1899 96 66 76 34.9 % 2007 9.2 %
Monik : 1868 73 78 71 44.4 % 1908 21.1 %
Chessterfield : 1864 65 20 499 19.7 % 2107 4.2 %
TSCP : 1801 52 48 172 42.7 % 1852 13.4 %
Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
------------- ------ --- --- ---- ------ ---- ------
Zephyr : 1757 168 79 42 21.4 % 1983 9.5 %
SnailSCP : 1755 234 78 37 12.2 % 2099 8.1 %
Ozwald : 1720 68 66 91 42.3 % 1774 18.7 %
Noonian : 1684 158 47 90 14.4 % 1993 6.7 %
Storm : 1589 142 56 77 22.1 % 1809 2.6 %
LarsenVB : 1565 292 185 11 9.1 % 1965 18.2 %
Golem01 : 1397 242 64 49 8.2 % 1817 8.2 %
Raffaela : 992 0 0 3 0.0 % 1592 0.0 %

Well, we are drawing close to the wire. Calibration of the bottom programs is very problematic. Most of them are completely deterministic, and so playing a set of ten games only produces two distinct games. For instance, I ran 10 Raffaela games yesterday against TSCP and none of them were different than the ones already stored. Since I filter for duplicates, the net effect of those ten games was zero!
In the actual contest, if you lose the same way four times in a row, you still lost the games.
Just call me "no mercy" corbit.


my ftp site
He just won't go away: D
 

OT :-) / Re: Battle of the Crowns -- calibration data [are w

Postby pete » 27 Jun 2000, 20:07

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: pete at 27 June 2000 21:07:41:
Als Antwort auf: / As an answer to: Battle of the Crowns -- calibration data [are we there yet?] geschrieben von: / posted by: He just won't go away: Dann Corbit at 27 June 2000 20:52:39:
Your names are getting better and better :-) ; I also liked the "capricious" one :-)
pete
pete
 

Re: Battle of the Crowns -- calibration data [are we there y

Postby Stefano Gemma » 27 Jun 2000, 20:30

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Stefano Gemma at 27 June 2000 21:30:40:
Als Antwort auf: / As an answer to: Battle of the Crowns -- calibration data [are we there yet?] geschrieben von: / posted by: He just won't go away: Dann Corbit at 27 June 2000 20:52:39:
Raffaela : 992 0 0 3 0.0 % 1592 0.0 %

Well, we are drawing close to the wire. Calibration of the bottom programs is very problematic. Most of them are completely deterministic, and so playing a set of ten games only produces two distinct games. For instance, I ran 10 Raffaela games yesterday against TSCP and none of them were different than the ones already stored. Since I filter for duplicates, the net effect of those ten games was zero!
This means that i should work on a non-determnistic Raffaela... and give you the 4th release in three day ;-)))))))))))
Ciao!!!
PS: maybe this night......
Stefano Gemma
 


Return to Archive (Old Parsimony Forum)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests