Gromit 3.0-Comet B15: 13,5-6,5 (40/20')!!! (nt) (no text)

Archive of the old Parsimony forum. Some messages couldn't be restored. Limitations: Search for authors does not work, Parsimony specific formats do not work, threaded view does not work properly. Posting is disabled.

Gromit 3.0-Comet B15: 13,5-6,5 (40/20')!!! (nt) (no text)

Postby Mogens Larsen » 25 Feb 2000, 19:33

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Mogens Larsen at 25 February 2000 19:33:42:
Mogens Larsen
 

Re: Gromit 3.0-Comet B15: 13,5-6,5 (40/20')!!! (nt) (no text

Postby Frank Schneider » 26 Feb 2000, 07:32

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Frank Schneider at 26 February 2000 07:32:11:
Als Antwort auf:/As an answer to: Gromit 3.0-Comet B15: 13,5-6,5 (40/20')!!! (nt) (no text) geschrieben von:/posted by: Mogens Larsen at 25 February 2000 19:33:42:
Hi,
Comet is definately stronger than this result suggests. We had similar
results in our testmatches - it seems Comet just doesn't like Gromit 3.0s
style. On the other hand there are programs which Comet will beat but not
Gromit.
Strenght of programs isn't transitive at all
(a>b && b>c ==/==> a>c)
Frank
Frank Schneider
 

Re: Gromit 3.0-Comet B15: 13,5-6,5 (40/20')!!! (nt) (no text

Postby Mogens Larsen » 26 Feb 2000, 11:07

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Mogens Larsen at 26 February 2000 11:07:13:
Als Antwort auf:/As an answer to: Re: Gromit 3.0-Comet B15: 13,5-6,5 (40/20')!!! (nt) (no text) geschrieben von:/posted by: Frank Schneider at 26 February 2000 07:32:11:
Hi,
Comet is definately stronger than this result suggests. We had similar
results in our testmatches - it seems Comet just doesn't like Gromit 3.0s
style. On the other hand there are programs which Comet will beat but not
Gromit.
Strenght of programs isn't transitive at all
(a>b && b>c ==/==> a>c)
Frank
I agree, but it would appear that Gromit has improved in rapid-semirapid games, which is noteworthy. It still has trouble with Crafty though, but who hasn't :o)
Best wishes...
Mogens
PS: Have you tried building a book from the 2600.pgn at Corbits site?
Mogens Larsen
 

Re: Gromit 3.0-Comet B15: 13,5-6,5 (40/20')!!!

Postby Volker Pittlik » 26 Feb 2000, 11:28

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Volker Pittlik at 26 February 2000 11:28:58:
Als Antwort auf:/As an answer to: Re: Gromit 3.0-Comet B15: 13,5-6,5 (40/20')!!! (nt) (no text) geschrieben von:/posted by: Frank Schneider at 26 February 2000 07:32:11:
Hi,
Comet is definately stronger than this result suggests. We had similar
results in our testmatches - it seems Comet just doesn't like Gromit 3.0s
style.
Indeed:

Results from file d:\winboard\pr_CometB15-Gromit3(g_60).pgn:
No. Name Win Draw Loss Unf. Score Games %
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Gromit_30 +7 =4 -4 *0 9.0 15 60.0%
2 CometB15 +4 =4 -7 *0 6.0 15 40.0%
Total Games: 15
White Wins: 7 (46.7%)
Black Wins: 4 (26.7%)
Draws: 4 (26.7%)
Unfinished: 0 (0.0%)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2*433 Cel, ~32 MB hash, ponder=on, game in 60, 3,4 + some 5 men-tablebases
----------------------------------------------------------------------

PGN available on request.
Volker
Volker Pittlik
 

Gromit beat Crafty in a 40/100' match.

Postby Mogens Larsen » 26 Feb 2000, 18:46

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Mogens Larsen at 26 February 2000 18:46:06:
Als Antwort auf:/As an answer to: Re: Gromit 3.0-Comet B15: 13,5-6,5 (40/20')!!! (nt) (no text) geschrieben von:/posted by: Mogens Larsen at 26 February 2000 11:07:13:
[Event "Testmatch: 40/100'"]
[Site "MOGENS"]
[Date "2000.02.26"]
[Round ""]
[White "Gromit 3.0"]
[Black "Crafty 17.8c"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C88"]
[PlyCount "108"]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 O-O 8. a4
Bb7 9. d3 d6 10. c3 h6 11. Na3 b4 12. Nc4 bxc3 13. bxc3 Rb8 14. Ba3 Nd7 15. d4
exd4 16. cxd4 Re8 17. Qc2 Bf6 18. Rad1 Be7 19. Rc1 Bf6 20. Qd2 Be7 21. Qa2 Rf8
22. Rb1 Kh8 23. Qc2 Nb6 24. d5 Na7 25. Na5 Bc8 26. Rec1 Na8 27. Nd4 Rb6 28.
Nac6 Nxc6 29. Nxc6 Qe8 30. a5 Rb7 31. Re1 Bg5 32. Bc4 Rg8 33. Bb4 Bd7 34. Bxa6
Bxc6 35. Qxc6 Qxc6 36. dxc6 Rxb4 37. Rxb4 Bd2 38. Reb1 Bxb4 39. Rxb4 Re8 40.
Rb7 Re5 41. Ra7 Rxa5 42. Rxa8+ Kh7 43. Bb7 Rxa8 44. Bxa8 g5 45. g4 Kg6 46. Kg2
Kf6 47. f4 Ke7 48. Bb7 f6 49. Bc8 Kd8 50. Be6 Ke7 51. f5 Kd8 52. Kf3 Ke8 53.
Kg3 Kf8 54. h4 54... Ke7 {Black resigns} 1-0

Good game, but 4... Nf6 isn't the best variation of the Ruy Lopez.
Best wishes...
Mogens
Mogens Larsen
 

Re: Gromit beat Crafty in a 40/100' match.

Postby Mogens Larsen » 26 Feb 2000, 19:12

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Mogens Larsen at 26 February 2000 19:12:08:
Als Antwort auf:/As an answer to: Gromit beat Crafty in a 40/100' match. geschrieben von:/posted by: Mogens Larsen at 26 February 2000 18:46:06:
[Event "Testmatch: 40/100'"]
[Site "MOGENS"]
[Date "2000.02.26"]
[Round ""]
[White "Gromit 3.0"]
[Black "Crafty 17.8c"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C88"]
[PlyCount "108"]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 O-O 8. a4
Bb7 9. d3 d6 10. c3 h6 11. Na3 b4 12. Nc4 bxc3 13. bxc3 Rb8 14. Ba3 Nd7 15. d4
exd4 16. cxd4 Re8 17. Qc2 Bf6 18. Rad1 Be7 19. Rc1 Bf6 20. Qd2 Be7 21. Qa2 Rf8
22. Rb1 Kh8 23. Qc2 Nb6 24. d5 Na7 25. Na5 Bc8 26. Rec1 Na8 27. Nd4 Rb6 28.
Nac6 Nxc6 29. Nxc6 Qe8 30. a5 Rb7 31. Re1 Bg5 32. Bc4 Rg8 33. Bb4 Bd7 34. Bxa6
Bxc6 35. Qxc6 Qxc6 36. dxc6 Rxb4 37. Rxb4 Bd2 38. Reb1 Bxb4 39. Rxb4 Re8 40.
Rb7 Re5 41. Ra7 Rxa5 42. Rxa8+ Kh7 43. Bb7 Rxa8 44. Bxa8 g5 45. g4 Kg6 46. Kg2
Kf6 47. f4 Ke7 48. Bb7 f6 49. Bc8 Kd8 50. Be6 Ke7 51. f5 Kd8 52. Kf3 Ke8 53.
Kg3 Kf8 54. h4 54... Ke7 {Black resigns} 1-0

Good game, but 4... Nf6 isn't the best variation of the Ruy Lopez.
Ignore the stupid comment about 4... Nf6 even tough Ruy Lopez generally is difficult for computers playing black.
Best wishes...
Mogens
Mogens Larsen
 


Return to Archive (Old Parsimony Forum)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests