A new Yace book is available for download.

Archive of the old Parsimony forum. Some messages couldn't be restored. Limitations: Search for authors does not work, Parsimony specific formats do not work, threaded view does not work properly. Posting is disabled.

A new Yace book is available for download.

Postby Mogens Larsen » 07 Jul 2000, 19:47

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Mogens Larsen at 07 July 2000 20:47:42:
I've increased the number of games to 66320 without duplicates, thereby hopefully closing a few holes. The size is about 4Mb zipped and 6Mb unzipped. The depth is still 20ply due to size limitation.
I haven't really been testing the book yet, so feedback would be nice.
Best wishes...
Mogens


Moq
Mogens Larsen
 

Re: A new Yace book is available for download.

Postby Aaron » 09 Jul 2000, 15:36

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Aaron at 09 July 2000 16:36:11:
Als Antwort auf: / As an answer to: A new Yace book is available for download. geschrieben von: / posted by: Mogens Larsen at 07 July 2000 20:47:42:
I've increased the number of games to 66320 without duplicates, thereby >hopefully closing a few holes. The size is about 4Mb zipped and 6Mb unzipped. >The depth is still 20ply due to size limitation.
I haven't really been testing the book yet, so feedback would be nice.

Quite test..Looks good..Reasonable range of openings..


Only one weird line, I saw so far

1 e4 e5 2 f4 d5 3 ed ef?!
Not sure, but IMHO Black's third move might be considered very bad..
Aaron
 

Re: A new Yace book is available for download.

Postby Mogens Larsen » 09 Jul 2000, 15:59

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Mogens Larsen at 09 July 2000 16:59:35:
Als Antwort auf: / As an answer to: Re: A new Yace book is available for download. geschrieben von: / posted by: Aaron at 09 July 2000 16:36:11:
I've increased the number of games to 66320 without duplicates, thereby >hopefully closing a few holes. The size is about 4Mb zipped and 6Mb unzipped. >The depth is still 20ply due to size limitation.
I haven't really been testing the book yet, so feedback would be nice.

Quite test..Looks good..Reasonable range of openings..

Only one weird line, I saw so far
1 e4 e5 2 f4 d5 3 ed ef?!
Not sure, but IMHO Black's third move might be considered very bad..
There's probably quite a few weird lines, but hopefully rare and therefore not very probable. I'm looking forward to the implementation of comments to avoid frequent and dubious moves.
Best wishes...
Mogens
Mogens Larsen
 

Re: A new Yace book is available for download.

Postby Aaron » 09 Jul 2000, 16:42

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Aaron at 09 July 2000 17:42:51:
Als Antwort auf: / As an answer to: Re: A new Yace book is available for download. geschrieben von: / posted by: Mogens Larsen at 09 July 2000 16:59:35:
I've increased the number of games to 66320 without duplicates, thereby >hopefully closing a few holes. The size is about 4Mb zipped and 6Mb unzipped. >The depth is still 20ply due to size limitation.
I haven't really been testing the book yet, so feedback would be nice.

Quite test..Looks good..Reasonable range of openings..

Only one weird line, I saw so far
1 e4 e5 2 f4 d5 3 ed ef?!
Not sure, but IMHO Black's third move might be considered very bad..
There's probably quite a few weird lines, but hopefully rare and therefore not >very probable.
True..
I also tried the old anti-computer trick of the stonewall attack..
The straight forward 1 d4 d5 2 e3 Nf6 3 Bd3 is well countered by your book..3..c5 4 c3 Nf6 5 f4 Bg4 etc..
But the move order 1 d4 Nf6 2 e3 e6 3 Bd3 d5 4 f4 nc6 5 c3 etc seems to work..
Aaron
 

Stonewall attack

Postby Aaron » 09 Jul 2000, 16:45

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Aaron at 09 July 2000 17:45:52:
Als Antwort auf: / As an answer to: Re: A new Yace book is available for download. geschrieben von: / posted by: Aaron at 09 July 2000 17:42:51:
I've increased the number of games to 66320 without duplicates, thereby >hopefully closing a few holes. The size is about 4Mb zipped and 6Mb unzipped. >The depth is still 20ply due to size limitation.
I haven't really been testing the book yet, so feedback would be nice.

Quite test..Looks good..Reasonable range of openings..

Only one weird line, I saw so far
1 e4 e5 2 f4 d5 3 ed ef?!
Not sure, but IMHO Black's third move might be considered very bad..
There's probably quite a few weird lines, but hopefully rare and therefore not >very probable.
True..
I also tried the old anti-computer trick of the stonewall attack..
The straight forward 1 d4 d5 2 e3 Nf6 3 Bd3 is well countered by your >book..3..c5 4 c3 Nf6 5 f4 Bg4 etc..
But the move order 1 d4 Nf6 2 e3 e6 3 Bd3 d5 4 f4 nc6 5 c3 etc seems to work..
Oops I mean 4..Nc6
Aaron
 

weird line in king's gambit

Postby Han » 10 Jul 2000, 08:50

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Han at 10 July 2000 09:50:02:
Als Antwort auf: / As an answer to: Stonewall attack geschrieben von: / posted by: Aaron at 09 July 2000 17:45:52:
I've increased the number of games to 66320 without duplicates, thereby >hopefully closing a few holes. The size is about 4Mb zipped and 6Mb unzipped. >The depth is still 20ply due to size limitation.
I haven't really been testing the book yet, so feedback would be nice.

Quite test..Looks good..Reasonable range of openings..

Only one weird line, I saw so far
1 e4 e5 2 f4 d5 3 ed ef?!
Not sure, but IMHO Black's third move might be considered very bad..
There's probably quite a few weird lines, but hopefully rare and therefore not >very probable.
True..
I also tried the old anti-computer trick of the stonewall attack..
The straight forward 1 d4 d5 2 e3 Nf6 3 Bd3 is well countered by your >book..3..c5 4 c3 Nf6 5 f4 Bg4 etc..
But the move order 1 d4 Nf6 2 e3 e6 3 Bd3 d5 4 f4 nc6 5 c3 etc seems to work..
Oops I mean 4..Nc6
Apparently that is black's best line in the king's gambit theoretically! That is the modern variation By transposition!
Han
Han
 

Re: weird line in king's gambit

Postby Aaron » 10 Jul 2000, 10:17

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Aaron at 10 July 2000 11:17:21:
Als Antwort auf: / As an answer to: weird line in king's gambit geschrieben von: / posted by: Han at 10 July 2000 09:50:02:
Only one weird line, I saw so far
1 e4 e5 2 f4 d5 3 ed ef?!
Not sure, but IMHO Black's third move might be considered very bad..
Apparently that is black's best line in the king's gambit theoretically! That >is the modern variation By transposition!

You might be right..However, must white play 4 Nf3 to transpose?I have no idea..But let me check the books..
Aaron
 


Return to Archive (Old Parsimony Forum)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 35 guests