Dann , 3rd round :-) ?? (nt)

[pete]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: pete at 26 July 2000 20:51:24:

[Dann Corbit]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Dann Corbit at 26 July 2000 21:39:12:
Als Antwort auf: / As an answer to: Dann , 3rd round ?? (nt) geschrieben von: / posted by: pete at 26 July 2000 20:51:24:
Probably two more days until it is completed. Here are the current ELO ratings. It should still be quite a while until we get reliable figures.
If you are ever dying to know something about the contest, you can go to the "Battle of the Crowns" subdirectory of my ftp site for the latest scoop.

Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
1 Crafty : 2583 192 186 12 75.0 % 2392 33.3 %
2 LGoliath : 2537 170 297 12 91.7 % 2120 16.7 %
3 TCBishop : 2448 198 325 8 43.8 % 2492 37.5 %
4 Gromit3 : 2413 223 210 12 58.3 % 2355 16.7 %
5 Bringer : 2403 232 144 12 54.2 % 2374 41.7 %
6 Gromit2 : 2368 310 249 8 62.5 % 2280 25.0 %
7 SOS : 2343 166 223 12 41.7 % 2402 33.3 %
8 Amy : 2266 232 144 12 54.2 % 2237 41.7 %
9 Yace : 2238 128 206 12 33.3 % 2358 50.0 %
10 Comet : 2213 158 158 12 50.0 % 2213 50.0 %
11 AnMon : 2159 232 144 12 54.2 % 2130 41.7 %
12 Phalanx : 2158 194 214 12 37.5 % 2247 25.0 %
13 Francesca : 2124 275 199 12 29.2 % 2279 8.3 %
14 ZChess : 2017 280 180 12 16.7 % 2297 16.7 %

Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
1 ExChess : 2739 262 564 8 87.5 % 2401 0.0 %
2 Dragon : 2438 387 310 8 37.5 % 2527 0.0 %
3 ArasanX : 2381 206 229 12 66.7 % 2261 16.7 %
4 Knightx : 2368 451 284 8 25.0 % 2559 0.0 %
5 GNUChess4 : 2326 192 252 12 75.0 % 2136 16.7 %
6 InmiChess3 : 2317 325 292 8 56.2 % 2273 12.5 %
7 lambChop : 2313 214 194 12 62.5 % 2224 25.0 %
8 Ant : 2291 199 275 12 70.8 % 2137 8.3 %
9 LDBlanche : 2188 229 206 12 33.3 % 2309 16.7 %
10 Fortress : 2117 451 284 8 25.0 % 2307 0.0 %
11 gnuchess : 2112 270 284 8 25.0 % 2303 25.0 %
12 Amyan : 2107 226 186 12 20.8 % 2338 25.0 %

Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
1 Sjeng73 : 2722 284 270 8 75.0 % 2531 25.0 %
2 Averno : 2626 284 451 8 75.0 % 2435 0.0 %
3 DChess : 2516 387 310 8 37.5 % 2605 0.0 %
4 Crux : 2504 270 284 8 25.0 % 2695 25.0 %
5 SSEchess : 2446 223 210 12 58.3 % 2387 16.7 %
6 Faile : 2395 214 247 12 62.5 % 2307 8.3 %
7 Freyr : 2325 249 310 8 37.5 % 2414 25.0 %
8 Cilian : 2249 199 275 12 70.8 % 2095 8.3 %
9 NewRival : 2188 207 296 8 31.2 % 2325 37.5 %
10 ColChess : 2163 223 210 12 58.3 % 2104 16.7 %
11 Gully2 : 2160 223 210 12 58.3 % 2101 16.7 %
12 Chessterfield: 1667 412 55 12 4.2 % 2211 8.3 %

Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
1 LarsenVB : 2672 262 274 8 87.5 % 2334 25.0 %
2 Storm : 2579 310 249 8 62.5 % 2490 25.0 %
3 Ozwald : 2553 198 325 8 43.8 % 2597 37.5 %
4 Noonian : 2551 325 198 8 56.2 % 2507 37.5 %
5 Monik : 2398 214 247 12 62.5 % 2309 8.3 %
6 Zephyr : 2364 215 215 12 50.0 % 2364 16.7 %
7 TSCP : 2340 180 402 12 83.3 % 2060 0.0 %
8 SnailSCP : 2240 214 194 12 62.5 % 2152 25.0 %
9 Raffaela : 1941 297 170 12 8.3 % 2358 16.7 %
10 Golem01 : 1747 0 0 12 0.0 % 2347 0.0 %



my ftp site

[Hlemp]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Hlemp at 26 July 2000 22:12:21:
Als Antwort auf: / As an answer to: Re: Dann , 3rd round ?? (nt) geschrieben von: / posted by: Dann Corbit at 26 July 2000 21:39:12:
Hey Dan,

[Hlemp]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Hlemp at 26 July 2000 22:16:56:
Als Antwort auf: / As an answer to: Re: Dann , 3rd round ?? (nt) geschrieben von: / posted by: Dann Corbit at 26 July 2000 21:39:12:
Sorry I pressed enter in my last message and never got to finish!
My question was, do you use the newest versions of all the engines in the BOC? Like the ones found on the Young Talents CD?
Just Wondering,
Bye.

[Do I smell something funn]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Do I smell something funny? Oh, it's just: Dann Corbit at 26 July 2000 22:23:35:
Als Antwort auf: / As an answer to: Oops! geschrieben von: / posted by: Hlemp at 26 July 2000 22:16:56:

Sorry I pressed enter in my last message and never got to finish!
My question was, do you use the newest versions of all the engines in the BOC? Like the ones found on the Young Talents CD?

Nothing from the Young Talents CD.
All the programs had to be original creations from their authors.
All the programs had to be freely available without fee (other than media cost, phone connect time, or whatever)
All the programs had to be available at the start date of the contest.
Programs that made illegal moves or crashed were not to be allowed (one slipped through, though)
No changes to the programs once the contest started.


my ftp site

[Hlemp]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Hlemp at 26 July 2000 22:57:50:
Als Antwort auf: / As an answer to: Re: Oops! geschrieben von: / posted by: Do I smell something funny? Oh, it's just: Dann Corbit at 26 July 2000 22:23:35:

Sorry I pressed enter in my last message and never got to finish!
My question was, do you use the newest versions of all the engines in the BOC? Like the ones found on the Young Talents CD?

Nothing from the Young Talents CD.
All the programs had to be original creations from their authors.
All the programs had to be freely available without fee (other than media cost, phone connect time, or whatever)
All the programs had to be available at the start date of the contest.
Programs that made illegal moves or crashed were not to be allowed (one slipped through, though)
No changes to the programs once the contest started.

[Uri Blass]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Uri Blass at 27 July 2000 11:31:24:
Als Antwort auf: / As an answer to: Re: Dann , 3rd round ?? (nt) geschrieben von: / posted by: Dann Corbit at 26 July 2000 21:39:12:

Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
1 LarsenVB : 2672 262 274 8 87.5 % 2334 25.0 %
2 Storm : 2579 310 249 8 62.5 % 2490 25.0 %
3 Ozwald : 2553 198 325 8 43.8 % 2597 37.5 %
4 Noonian : 2551 325 198 8 56.2 % 2507 37.5 %
5 Monik : 2398 214 247 12 62.5 % 2309 8.3 %
6 Zephyr : 2364 215 215 12 50.0 % 2364 16.7 %
7 TSCP : 2340 180 402 12 83.3 % 2060 0.0 %
8 SnailSCP : 2240 214 194 12 62.5 % 2152 25.0 %
9 Raffaela : 1941 297 170 12 8.3 % 2358 16.7 %
10 Golem01 : 1747 0 0 12 0.0 % 2347 0.0 %

TSCP did 50% against Monik and 100% against stronger opponents so giving TSCP lower elo than Monik based on your data is illogical.
Uri

[Uri Blass]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Uri Blass at 27 July 2000 11:34:10:
Als Antwort auf: / As an answer to: Re: Dann , 3rd round ?? (nt) geschrieben von: / posted by: Uri Blass at 27 July 2000 11:31:24:

Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
1 LarsenVB : 2672 262 274 8 87.5 % 2334 25.0 %
2 Storm : 2579 310 249 8 62.5 % 2490 25.0 %
3 Ozwald : 2553 198 325 8 43.8 % 2597 37.5 %
4 Noonian : 2551 325 198 8 56.2 % 2507 37.5 %
5 Monik : 2398 214 247 12 62.5 % 2309 8.3 %
6 Zephyr : 2364 215 215 12 50.0 % 2364 16.7 %
7 TSCP : 2340 180 402 12 83.3 % 2060 0.0 %
8 SnailSCP : 2240 214 194 12 62.5 % 2152 25.0 %
9 Raffaela : 1941 297 170 12 8.3 % 2358 16.7 %
10 Golem01 : 1747 0 0 12 0.0 % 2347 0.0 %

TSCP did 50% against Monik and 100% against stronger opponents so giving TSCP lower elo than Monik based on your data is illogical.
Uri

The 100% against weaker opponents but it is not logical to punish TSCP for getting 100% against weaker opponents.
Uri

[Mogens Larsen]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Mogens Larsen at 27 July 2000 12:45:40:
Als Antwort auf: / As an answer to: correction geschrieben von: / posted by: Uri Blass at 27 July 2000 11:34:10:

TSCP did 50% against Monik and 100% against stronger opponents so giving TSCP lower elo than Monik based on your data is illogical.
Uri

The 100% against weaker opponents but it is not logical to punish TSCP for getting 100% against weaker opponents.

It's logical according to the ELO system considering the number of games played. The ELO will be more plausible when they've all meet each other. You're more than welcome to construct a better system in your spare time.
Best wishes...
Mogens

[Gian-Carlo Pascutto]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Gian-Carlo Pascutto at 27 July 2000 13:40:39:
Als Antwort auf: / As an answer to: Re: Oops! geschrieben von: / posted by: Do I smell something funny? Oh, it's just: Dann Corbit at 26 July 2000 22:23:35:

Programs that made illegal moves or crashed were not to be allowed (one >slipped through, though)
No changes to the programs once the contest started.

Sjeng73 seems to be doing great...BUT...
Just before releasing 7.3 final on my site I downloaded
the one from your site and to my horror it seemed to be
one of the broken versions....
Could you do me a favor and check which version you are using
for BOTC ?
It SHOULD NOT print full PV's in short algebraic notation.
(i.e. just display a score and certainly not something
like 'Nf3 Nf6 e4 e5 Bc4'.)
If it does, please check your mail to make sure you didn't
receive anything newer before the contest started.
I'm sorry for the hassle, but I'm frearing that it WILL
lock up in the middle of a game. It did so during testing
and I don't see why it wouldn't happen again...for all I
know I must have been lucky so far.
Thanks,
GCP

[Dann Corbit]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Dann Corbit at 27 July 2000 20:32:45:
Als Antwort auf: / As an answer to: Re: Dann , 3rd round ?? (nt) geschrieben von: / posted by: Uri Blass at 27 July 2000 11:31:24:

Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
1 LarsenVB : 2672 262 274 8 87.5 % 2334 25.0 %
2 Storm : 2579 310 249 8 62.5 % 2490 25.0 %
3 Ozwald : 2553 198 325 8 43.8 % 2597 37.5 %
4 Noonian : 2551 325 198 8 56.2 % 2507 37.5 %
5 Monik : 2398 214 247 12 62.5 % 2309 8.3 %
6 Zephyr : 2364 215 215 12 50.0 % 2364 16.7 %
7 TSCP : 2340 180 402 12 83.3 % 2060 0.0 %
8 SnailSCP : 2240 214 194 12 62.5 % 2152 25.0 %
9 Raffaela : 1941 297 170 12 8.3 % 2358 16.7 %
10 Golem01 : 1747 0 0 12 0.0 % 2347 0.0 %

TSCP did 50% against Monik and 100% against stronger opponents so giving TSCP lower elo than Monik based on your data is illogical.

It is completely logical. There is not a single game between the programs in different divisions. If you saw some sort of leveling, it would be an indication that I am cheating.
This post shows something that I have been trying to achieve -- there is a broad misunderstanding about how the ELO system works.


my ftp site

[Uri Blass]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Uri Blass at 27 July 2000 20:59:46:
Als Antwort auf: / As an answer to: Re: Dann , 3rd round ?? (nt) geschrieben von: / posted by: Dann Corbit at 27 July 2000 20:32:45:

Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
1 LarsenVB : 2672 262 274 8 87.5 % 2334 25.0 %
2 Storm : 2579 310 249 8 62.5 % 2490 25.0 %
3 Ozwald : 2553 198 325 8 43.8 % 2597 37.5 %
4 Noonian : 2551 325 198 8 56.2 % 2507 37.5 %
5 Monik : 2398 214 247 12 62.5 % 2309 8.3 %
6 Zephyr : 2364 215 215 12 50.0 % 2364 16.7 %
7 TSCP : 2340 180 402 12 83.3 % 2060 0.0 %
8 SnailSCP : 2240 214 194 12 62.5 % 2152 25.0 %
9 Raffaela : 1941 297 170 12 8.3 % 2358 16.7 %
10 Golem01 : 1747 0 0 12 0.0 % 2347 0.0 %

TSCP did 50% against Monik and 100% against stronger opponents so giving TSCP lower elo than Monik based on your data is illogical.

It is completely logical. There is not a single game between the programs in different divisions. If you saw some sort of leveling, it would be an indication that I am cheating.
This post shows something that I have been trying to achieve -- there is a broad misunderstanding about how the ELO system works.

I looked only at this division.
TSCP drew against Monik and got 100% in the other games so rating that is lower than Monik based only on the games in this division is illogical.
I also think that not using previous data to decide about the elo is not a good decision but this was not my point in my post.
Uri

[Dann Corbit]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Dann Corbit at 27 July 2000 21:23:13:
Als Antwort auf: / As an answer to: Version check geschrieben von: / posted by: Gian-Carlo Pascutto at 27 July 2000 13:40:39:

Programs that made illegal moves or crashed were not to be allowed (one >slipped through, though)
No changes to the programs once the contest started.

Sjeng73 seems to be doing great...BUT...
Just before releasing 7.3 final on my site I downloaded
the one from your site and to my horror it seemed to be
one of the broken versions....
Could you do me a favor and check which version you are using
for BOTC ?
It SHOULD NOT print full PV's in short algebraic notation.
(i.e. just display a score and certainly not something
like 'Nf3 Nf6 e4 e5 Bc4'.)
If it does, please check your mail to make sure you didn't
receive anything newer before the contest started.
I'm sorry for the hassle, but I'm frearing that it WILL
lock up in the middle of a game. It did so during testing
and I don't see why it wouldn't happen again...for all I
know I must have been lucky so far.

I have mailed the binary to you. I am using the executable dated 6-25-00 from your site.


my ftp site

[The Controversial One: D]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: The Controversial One: Dann Corbit at 27 July 2000 21:32:47:
Als Antwort auf: / As an answer to: Re: Dann , 3rd round ?? (nt) geschrieben von: / posted by: Uri Blass at 27 July 2000 20:59:46:

Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
1 LarsenVB : 2672 262 274 8 87.5 % 2334 25.0 %
2 Storm : 2579 310 249 8 62.5 % 2490 25.0 %
3 Ozwald : 2553 198 325 8 43.8 % 2597 37.5 %
4 Noonian : 2551 325 198 8 56.2 % 2507 37.5 %
5 Monik : 2398 214 247 12 62.5 % 2309 8.3 %
6 Zephyr : 2364 215 215 12 50.0 % 2364 16.7 %
7 TSCP : 2340 180 402 12 83.3 % 2060 0.0 %
8 SnailSCP : 2240 214 194 12 62.5 % 2152 25.0 %
9 Raffaela : 1941 297 170 12 8.3 % 2358 16.7 %
10 Golem01 : 1747 0 0 12 0.0 % 2347 0.0 %

TSCP did 50% against Monik and 100% against stronger opponents so giving TSCP lower elo than Monik based on your data is illogical.

It is completely logical. There is not a single game between the programs in different divisions. If you saw some sort of leveling, it would be an indication that I am cheating.
This post shows something that I have been trying to achieve -- there is a broad misunderstanding about how the ELO system works.

I looked only at this division.
TSCP drew against Monik and got 100% in the other games so rating that is lower than Monik based only on the games in this division is illogical.
I also think that not using previous data to decide about the elo is not a good decision but this was not my point in my post.

But the calculated ELO of its opponents was lower, and the opponents were not the same.
This is *NOT* a ranking list, but rather, a rating list.
I think it's a great decision. Look at how much awareness of the ELO system has resulted because of it. In fact, I think it is the best decision I have made in months, in computer chess.
The original ELO calculations did play games across clusters to provide an accurate ranking from top to bottom. If you look at the tolerance levels, you will see that even within a single standard deviation for each and every cluster, the top program could easily be the bottom and the bottom program could easily be the top. By the time the contest completes, there will be about one thousand games played, and the rankings will be accurate.


my ftp site

[Uri Blass]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Uri Blass at 27 July 2000 22:22:03:
Als Antwort auf: / As an answer to: Re: Dann , 3rd round ?? (nt) geschrieben von: / posted by: The Controversial One: Dann Corbit at 27 July 2000 21:32:47:

Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
1 LarsenVB : 2672 262 274 8 87.5 % 2334 25.0 %
2 Storm : 2579 310 249 8 62.5 % 2490 25.0 %
3 Ozwald : 2553 198 325 8 43.8 % 2597 37.5 %
4 Noonian : 2551 325 198 8 56.2 % 2507 37.5 %
5 Monik : 2398 214 247 12 62.5 % 2309 8.3 %
6 Zephyr : 2364 215 215 12 50.0 % 2364 16.7 %
7 TSCP : 2340 180 402 12 83.3 % 2060 0.0 %
8 SnailSCP : 2240 214 194 12 62.5 % 2152 25.0 %
9 Raffaela : 1941 297 170 12 8.3 % 2358 16.7 %
10 Golem01 : 1747 0 0 12 0.0 % 2347 0.0 %

TSCP did 50% against Monik and 100% against stronger opponents so giving TSCP lower elo than Monik based on your data is illogical.

It is completely logical. There is not a single game between the programs in different divisions. If you saw some sort of leveling, it would be an indication that I am cheating.
This post shows something that I have been trying to achieve -- there is a broad misunderstanding about how the ELO system works.

I looked only at this division.
TSCP drew against Monik and got 100% in the other games so rating that is lower than Monik based only on the games in this division is illogical.
I also think that not using previous data to decide about the elo is not a good decision but this was not my point in my post.

But the calculated ELO of its opponents was lower, and the opponents were not the same.
This is *NOT* a ranking list, but rather, a rating list.
I think it's a great decision. Look at how much awareness of the ELO system has resulted because of it.

I understand that it is not a ranking list but the list should tell us which program is probably better based on the games.
Suppose TSCP only has 4 games against Monik when the result is 2-2
Is it logical to give TSCP the same rating as Monik.
TSCP does not deserve to suffer from getting 100% against weak players so in the worst case the elo rating of TSCP should be equal to Monik.
I suggest to calculate the rating if you suppose the results happen again and again when the number of times get closer to infinite.
I am sure that in this case TSCP's rating cannot be lower than monic because it will go up by drawing against monik and not going down by the 100% result against other programs.

I think that the rating should tell us which program is probably better.
I think that only games against programs with known rating should be counted for the rating list.
Uri

[Oink, Oink -- said: Dann]

Geschrieben von: / Posted by: Oink, Oink -- said: Dann Corbit at 27 July 2000 22:58:13:
Als Antwort auf: / As an answer to: Re: Dann , 3rd round ?? (nt) geschrieben von: / posted by: Uri Blass at 27 July 2000 22:22:03:
[snip]

I also think that not using previous data to decide about the elo is not a good decision but this was not my point in my post.

I think it's a great decision. Look at how much awareness of the ELO system has resulted because of it.

I think that the rating should tell us which program is probably better.
I think that only games against programs with known rating should be counted for the rating list.

Yes, exactly.
People look at SSDF results and think that the programs have those ratings as FIDE ratings, but there is no way to form such a connection. Look at the ELO of LarsenVB. It seems to be ready to face Kasparov and Anand. So what's wrong?
Many things, the chief one of which is that it has never played against them or other common opponents, so there is no connection to the ELO values.
These listings are actually designed to create controversy. I wanted to make people react with alarm (and effectively achieved that goal). The mathematics of the ELO system are broadly misunderstood. Your reactions are actually correct and those from a person in a position of understanding. However, the issued you have raised will be very helpful for persons who do not understand the system.
Here is the more "Traditional" tournament list, and the final results will be published in this format:

Program Score % Av.Op. Elo + - Draws
1 LGoliath : 11.0/ 12 91.7 2117 2533 170 297 16.7 %
2 Crafty : 9.0/ 12 75.0 2402 2593 192 186 33.3 %
3 Gromit3 : 7.0/ 12 58.3 2342 2401 223 210 16.7 %
4 Amy : 6.5/ 12 54.2 2223 2252 232 144 41.7 %
5 AnMon : 6.5/ 12 54.2 2121 2150 232 144 41.7 %
6 Bringer : 6.5/ 12 54.2 2380 2409 232 144 41.7 %
7 TCBishop : 6.5/ 12 54.2 2435 2464 232 144 41.7 %
8 Comet : 6.0/ 12 50.0 2215 2215 158 158 50.0 %
9 Gromit2 : 6.0/ 12 50.0 2328 2328 187 187 33.3 %
10 SOS : 5.0/ 12 41.7 2408 2350 166 223 33.3 %
11 Phalanx : 4.5/ 12 37.5 2226 2137 194 214 25.0 %
12 Yace : 4.0/ 12 33.3 2360 2240 128 206 50.0 %
13 Francesca : 3.5/ 12 29.2 2268 2114 275 199 8.3 %
14 ZChess : 2.0/ 12 16.7 2294 2014 280 180 16.7 %

Program Score % Av.Op. Elo + - Draws
1 ExChess : 10.0/ 12 83.3 2275 2554 180 402 0.0 %
2 GNUChess4 : 9.0/ 12 75.0 2170 2361 192 252 16.7 %
3 Ant : 8.5/ 12 70.8 2207 2361 199 275 8.3 %
4 ArasanX : 8.0/ 12 66.7 2227 2348 206 229 16.7 %
5 lambChop : 7.5/ 12 62.5 2226 2315 214 194 25.0 %
6 InmiChess3[1] : 6.5/ 11 59.1 2254 2318 237 250 9.1 %
7 Dragon : 3.0/ 8 37.5 2435 2347 387 310 0.0 %
8 LDBlanche : 4.0/ 12 33.3 2345 2225 229 206 16.7 %
9 Fortress[1] : 3.0/ 11 27.3 2349 2178 346 211 0.0 %
10 gnuchess : 3.0/ 12 25.0 2410 2220 252 192 16.7 %
11 Knightx : 2.0/ 8 25.0 2450 2259 451 284 0.0 %
12 Amyan : 2.5/ 12 20.8 2341 2109 226 186 25.0 %
[1] One InmiChess-Fortress game unfinished is why this list looks so strange...
Program Score % Av.Op. Elo + - Draws
1 Sjeng73 : 10.0/ 12 83.3 2402 2682 180 280 16.7 %
2 Averno : 9.0/ 12 75.0 2437 2628 192 340 0.0 %
3 Cilian : 8.5/ 12 70.8 2057 2211 199 275 8.3 %
4 Faile : 7.5/ 12 62.5 2275 2364 214 247 8.3 %
5 Gully2 : 7.0/ 12 58.3 2066 2125 223 210 16.7 %
6 ColChess : 7.0/ 12 58.3 2082 2141 223 210 16.7 %
7 SSEchess : 7.0/ 12 58.3 2363 2421 223 210 16.7 %
8 Freyr : 3.0/ 8 37.5 2394 2305 249 310 25.0 %
9 DChess : 4.0/ 12 33.3 2594 2474 298 206 0.0 %
10 Crux : 2.0/ 8 25.0 2672 2481 270 284 25.0 %
11 NewRival : 2.5/ 12 20.8 2432 2200 226 186 25.0 %
12 Chessterfield : 0.5/ 12 4.2 2176 1631 412 55 8.3 %

Program Score % Av.Op. Elo + - Draws
1 LarsenVB : 7.0/ 8 87.5 2334 2672 262 274 25.0 %
2 TSCP : 10.0/ 12 83.3 2060 2340 180 402 0.0 %
3 SnailSCP : 7.5/ 12 62.5 2152 2240 214 194 25.0 %
4 Monik : 7.5/ 12 62.5 2309 2398 214 247 8.3 %
5 Storm : 5.0/ 8 62.5 2490 2579 310 249 25.0 %
6 Noonian : 4.5/ 8 56.2 2507 2551 325 198 37.5 %
7 Zephyr : 6.0/ 12 50.0 2364 2364 215 215 16.7 %
8 Ozwald : 3.5/ 8 43.8 2597 2553 198 325 37.5 %
9 Raffaela : 1.0/ 12 8.3 2358 1941 297 170 16.7 %
10 Golem01 : 0.0/ 12 0.0 2347 1747 0 0 0.0 %


my ftp site