Phalanx22 vs. LG2000V2 25-26-9 (3-min.-Blitz) (no text)

[Arnold Koschorreck]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Arnold Koschorreck am 24 Januar 2000 09:56:33:

[CL]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: CL am 25 Januar 2000 10:53:52:
Als Antwort auf:/As an answer to: Phalanx22 vs. LG2000V2 25-26-9 (3-min.-Blitz) (no text) geschrieben von:/posted by: Arnold Koschorreck am 24 Januar 2000 09:56:33:
Triple the time and things will change...
CHristian

[Aaron]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Aaron am 26 Januar 2000 07:01:53:
Als Antwort auf:/As an answer to: Re: Phalanx22 vs. LG2000V2 25-26-9 (3-min.-Blitz) (no text) geschrieben von:/posted by: CL am 25 Januar 2000 10:53:52:

Triple the time and things will change...
CHristian

Triple the time 9min game and ?? Are you implying that Lg2000v2 will win crushingly?

[CL]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: CL am 26 Januar 2000 08:59:16:
Als Antwort auf:/As an answer to: Re: Phalanx22 vs. LG2000V2 25-26-9 (3-min.-Blitz) (no text) geschrieben von:/posted by: Aaron am 26 Januar 2000 07:01:53:

Triple the time and things will change...
CHristian

Triple the time 9min game and ?? Are you implying that Lg2000v2 will win crushingly?

I wouldn´t say this. I am testing here a newer version and it is really strong. But I need more tests with ph22 for a final conclusion.
Fact: LG needs a litte bit more time, may be 6-10m on 500 mhz hardware.
Christian

[Alexandre Côme]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Alexandre Côme am 26 Januar 2000 11:43:48:
Als Antwort auf:/As an answer to: Re: Phalanx22 vs. LG2000V2 25-26-9 (3-min.-Blitz) (no text) geschrieben von:/posted by: CL am 26 Januar 2000 08:59:16:

Triple the time and things will change...
CHristian

Triple the time 9min game and ?? Are you implying that Lg2000v2 will win crushingly?

I wouldn´t say this. I am testing here a newer version and it is really strong. But I need more tests with ph22 for a final conclusion.
Fact: LG needs a litte bit more time, may be 6-10m on 500 mhz hardware.
Christian

Hello,
I think that in slow games Phalanx 22 crush easily LG2000 v2 !
Best Regards
Alexandre Côme

[Aaron]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Aaron am 27 Januar 2000 05:05:11:
Als Antwort auf:/As an answer to: Re: Phalanx22 vs. LG2000V2 25-26-9 (3-min.-Blitz) (no text) geschrieben von:/posted by: Alexandre Côme am 26 Januar 2000 11:43:48:

Triple the time and things will change...
CHristian

Triple the time 9min game and ?? Are you implying that Lg2000v2 will win crushingly?

I wouldn´t say this. I am testing here a newer version and it is really strong.
Fact: LG needs a litte bit more time, may be 6-10m on 500 mhz hardware.
Christian

Hello,
I think that in slow games Phalanx 22 crush easily LG2000 v2 !
Best Regards
Alexandre Côme

Would that be version 2.05? BTW will there/is there a commericial version of goliath? If not why not just release the full version?
My impression is that Lgol is super fast..The fact is it's already a fast searcher and the fact that the light version is lacking "knowledge" makes it even faster . At fast time limits, it's interesting to see that it searches 2 plies or more than most of the other winboard engines..Seems to crush most except for crafty (which itself is quite fast+ excellent knowledge)
At longer time limits, i think the faster search of Lgolith wouldn't translate to that many plies..
BTW, I'm new here so please excuse me if I make any obviously dumb statements

[Jason Williamson]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Jason Williamson am 30 Januar 2000 12:34:11:
Als Antwort auf:/As an answer to: Re: Phalanx22 vs. LG2000V2 25-26-9 (3-min.-Blitz) (no text) geschrieben von:/posted by: Aaron am 27 Januar 2000 05:05:11:

Triple the time and things will change...
CHristian

Triple the time 9min game and ?? Are you implying that Lg2000v2 will win crushingly?

I wouldn´t say this. I am testing here a newer version and it is really strong.
Fact: LG needs a litte bit more time, may be 6-10m on 500 mhz hardware.
Christian

Hello,
I think that in slow games Phalanx 22 crush easily LG2000 v2 !
Best Regards
Alexandre Côme

Would that be version 2.05? BTW will there/is there a commericial version of goliath? If not why not just release the full version?
My impression is that Lgol is super fast..The fact is it's already a fast searcher and the fact that the light version is lacking "knowledge" makes it even faster . At fast time limits, it's interesting to see that it searches 2 plies or more than most of the other winboard engines..Seems to crush most except for crafty (which itself is quite fast+ excellent knowledge)
At longer time limits, i think the faster search of Lgolith wouldn't translate to that many plies..
BTW, I'm new here so please excuse me if I make any obviously dumb statements

Hello
From personal experience, version 2.5 of LG2000 is at least 50 rating points strong at slower time controls then other version. While Phalanx is quite strong, I really have my doubts that it would be able to compeat with LG now. Too bad the author of Phalanx didn't enter the ICC tourney.

[Alexandre Côme]

Geschrieben von:/Posted by: Alexandre Côme am 30 Januar 2000 22:41:57:
Als Antwort auf:/As an answer to: LG stuff geschrieben von:/posted by: Jason Williamson am 30 Januar 2000 12:34:11:

Triple the time and things will change...
CHristian

Triple the time 9min game and ?? Are you implying that Lg2000v2 will win crushingly?

I wouldn´t say this. I am testing here a newer version and it is really strong.
Fact: LG needs a litte bit more time, may be 6-10m on 500 mhz hardware.
Christian

Hello,
I think that in slow games Phalanx 22 crush easily LG2000 v2 !
Best Regards
Alexandre Côme

Would that be version 2.05? BTW will there/is there a commericial version of goliath? If not why not just release the full version?
My impression is that Lgol is super fast..The fact is it's already a fast searcher and the fact that the light version is lacking "knowledge" makes it even faster . At fast time limits, it's interesting to see that it searches 2 plies or more than most of the other winboard engines..Seems to crush most except for crafty (which itself is quite fast+ excellent knowledge)
At longer time limits, i think the faster search of Lgolith wouldn't translate to that many plies..
BTW, I'm new here so please excuse me if I make any obviously dumb statements

Hello
From personal experience, version 2.5 of LG2000 is at least 50 rating points strong at slower time controls then other version. While Phalanx is quite strong, I really have my doubts that it would be able to compeat with LG now. Too bad the author of Phalanx didn't enter the ICC tourney.

Hello Jason,
I am sure that Phalanx 22 is stronger than LG2000 V2 in slow games !!
For me the 2.5 doesn't exist because it is not publicly available !
Best Regards
Alexandre Côme