Geschrieben von: / Posted by: pete at 27 June 2000 18:11:50:
Als Antwort auf: / As an answer to: Amended result (and apologies) - Bringer 1.7 v CometB23. geschrieben von: / posted by: Graham Banks at 27 June 2000 12:43:49:
I originally posted this result as a +4 -2 =2 in favour of Comet. However, only the last 4 games of the match were played with Bringer on consistent hash settings (10pos, 4eval, 2pawn). I replayed the first 4 games of the match on these settings in the interests of consistency and guess what? The correct outcome of the match is: Bringer 1.7 v CometB23 +4 -3 =1.
Sorry for being too hasty in posting my original message. Hope I haven't stuffed anybody's ratings up too much!
P166, ponder off, 16mb hash each, 60 moves in 60 minutes.
Look for the result of my Yace0.18 v Little Goliath 2000 (v28) being posted tomorrow.
Regards, Graham.
A good result for Bringer , in fact I think both of them , where the 2nd one is quite sensational

.
If Bringer was really slowed down by your posted initial settings by say 10% it is not such a big deal ; this is the first match I have seen where Bringer held itself well against Comet and I suspect Bringer was a little lucky ( but haven't checked on Comet for a long time I have to admit ) .
Is there a chance to have a look at your games ? If they are not on a webpage I would be happy if you could send them to me per email ( just click on my name )or post them here .
Thanks.
pete